Rupert Sheldrake and Morphogenetic Fields FB posts

10697359_10152418278331024_5823144865480854179_o
Rupert Sheldrakes work on morphogenetic fields was so revolutionary it was voted the best candidate for book burning since Copernicus’ works..
__________________________

4 weeks ago

Kaan Onay
Beyond “Schrödingers Cat” video 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOYyCHGWJq4

The video also in the same direction and arjenbij (user on the comment section) is saying “If you think you understand quantum mechanics, then you dont understand quantum mechanics.” Richard Feynman said near version about “double slit experiment” as briefly “QM cannot be explained in classical way”. It means, explanation shouldn’t be made with magic, belief or with another way; otherwise it will not be count as “solution”…

What is that mean? First arjenbij’s one means, “quantum mechanics must be understood as unexplainable”.

How an unexplainable thing can be understood without explanation? The action of understanding must be made against a consideration. If there is no any faced consideration then action of understanding cannot be created. With this version of “QM understanding” can be either belief or stupidity.

Second one. A stupid thinks that everybody is like him and everybody are stupid.

If stupid cannot understand something then everybody is not able to understand anything, as a stupid result. Stupid thinks in stupidity, it is very simple. Belief is also same but Feynman’s quote is putting it into narrow way by saying “classical way” and belief is being out of the question.

A stupid is left in our hand who says for others “no one is intelligent enough to explain this experiment like me”.

We must understand that he is stupid by saying stupid not only for himself but also for us. If you believe in him you must be stupid also. In this case you brought “belief” into the topic as believer of Feynman. This is not Feynman’s fault; he is just an idiot think that he is the most genius man even in the future!!! But you are bringing the belief factor even he tells “solution must be in classical way”. You shouldn’t believe in him, you must stay in classical way as classical way follower. 

Feynman thinks stupidly that he is the most intelligent man. if he cannot solve this QM problem then everybody is not that intelligent. He is teaching you that you are less intelligent than him or simply you are stupid so you are learning to be stupid.

Overall this is stupidity in every way. Otherwise I wouldn’t write to you and if I think that you are stupid then I wouldn’t try to teach you that you are doing mistake. But idiot Feynman did it opposite; he thought people are stupid and he gave lessons to them.

If any teacher would think that students are idiot, then that useless teacher must quit that job and give up being teacher. Feynman’s situation is simple as this. To be a teacher for stupid people is also stupidity…

We must think in classical way. in the knowledge history humanity didn’t do nothing but explaining of unknown reality in classic way. But Feynman saying that the future of humanity will be opposite and you believe in him with “understanding of unexplained QM”… This is accepting lack of knowledge as “knowledge”!

If you are NOT stupid then you must say “we don’t know yet, but we are seeking for it” but if you are stupid then you would say “we know that “to know QM” is impossible and we are not seeking for any answer or solution for it because everybody cannot be more intelligent we believe in Feynman’s acceptance of limited intelligence”.

“Cat in the box dilemma” created for opposite of “thinking out of the box”. Put a human in the box with the mercy for cat and give pen and paper next to him. Humanity is development of knowledge even if we are death. 

You turned into a “science believer”. Science turned into a belief system and you left behind to be human by turning into a “science believer”. You are accepting stupidity created by an idiot teacher. Science stopped seeking answers for not to ruin the “science belief”. 

If you are not stupid, there are answers about everything not with magic or by belief. Proof of solution is as classic as soap balloons. A soap balloon has a sphere shape alone but when they are together, they turn into a new kind of shape with faces.

If sub atom particle are thought with its own emptiness, to understand QM, its main experiment double slit, even gravity or time can be understood. But if you think that “to seek answer is useless” as Feynman’s stupid believers then it would be stupidity to explain these problems to stupid humanity.

My hope is that you are doing mistake as “you think you understand quantum mechanics by not to understand quantum mechanics”…

You can find solution in my videos. Not kidding!

The Double-Slit Experiment is SOLVED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQpyA90noGs

Beyond “Schrödinger's Cat” video

www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOYyCHGWJq4

The video also in the same direction and arjenbij (user on the comment section) is saying “If you think you understand quantum mechanics, then you don't understand quantum mechanics.” Richard Feynman said near version about “double slit experiment” as briefly “QM cannot be explained in classical way”. It means, explanation shouldn’t be made with magic, belief or with another way; otherwise it will not be count as “solution”…

What is that mean? First arjenbij’s one means, “quantum mechanics must be understood as unexplainable”.

How an unexplainable thing can be understood without explanation? The action of understanding must be made against a consideration. If there is no any faced consideration then action of understanding cannot be created. With this version of “QM understanding” can be either belief or stupidity.

Second one. A stupid thinks that everybody is like him and everybody are stupid.

If stupid cannot understand something then everybody is not able to understand anything, as a stupid result. Stupid thinks in stupidity, it is very simple. Belief is also same but Feynman’s quote is putting it into narrow way by saying “classical way” and belief is being out of the question.

A stupid is left in our hand who says for others “no one is intelligent enough to explain this experiment like me”.

We must understand that he is stupid by saying stupid not only for himself but also for us. If you believe in him you must be stupid also. In this case you brought “belief” into the topic as believer of Feynman. This is not Feynman’s fault; he is just an idiot think that he is the most genius man even in the future!!! But you are bringing the belief factor even he tells “solution must be in classical way”. You shouldn’t believe in him, you must stay in classical way as classical way follower.

Feynman thinks stupidly that he is the most intelligent man. if he cannot solve this QM problem then everybody is not that intelligent. He is teaching you that you are less intelligent than him or simply you are stupid so you are learning to be stupid.

Overall this is stupidity in every way. Otherwise I wouldn’t write to you and if I think that you are stupid then I wouldn’t try to teach you that you are doing mistake. But idiot Feynman did it opposite; he thought people are stupid and he gave lessons to them.

If any teacher would think that students are idiot, then that useless teacher must quit that job and give up being teacher. Feynman’s situation is simple as this. To be a teacher for stupid people is also stupidity…

We must think in classical way. in the knowledge history humanity didn’t do nothing but explaining of unknown reality in classic way. But Feynman saying that the future of humanity will be opposite and you believe in him with “understanding of unexplained QM”… This is accepting lack of knowledge as “knowledge”!

If you are NOT stupid then you must say “we don’t know yet, but we are seeking for it” but if you are stupid then you would say “we know that “to know QM” is impossible and we are not seeking for any answer or solution for it because everybody cannot be more intelligent we believe in Feynman’s acceptance of limited intelligence”.

“Cat in the box dilemma” created for opposite of “thinking out of the box”. Put a human in the box with the mercy for cat and give pen and paper next to him. Humanity is development of knowledge even if we are death.

You turned into a “science believer”. Science turned into a belief system and you left behind to be human by turning into a “science believer”. You are accepting stupidity created by an idiot teacher. Science stopped seeking answers for not to ruin the “science belief”.

If you are not stupid, there are answers about everything not with magic or by belief. Proof of solution is as classic as soap balloons. A soap balloon has a sphere shape alone but when they are together, they turn into a new kind of shape with faces.

If sub atom particle are thought with its own emptiness, to understand QM, its main experiment double slit, even gravity or time can be understood. But if you think that “to seek answer is useless” as Feynman’s stupid believers then it would be stupidity to explain these problems to stupid humanity.

My hope is that you are doing mistake as “you think you understand quantum mechanics by not to understand quantum mechanics”…

You can find solution in my videos. Not kidding!

The Double-Slit Experiment is SOLVED
www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQpyA90noGs
... See MoreSee Less

 

Comment on Facebook

I'm from Sweden, I'll call the king so you can get a Nobel price in rhetoric...at least.

+ View previous comments

4 months ago

Roberto Murzzi
Video image

Excerpt from "A Quest beyond the Limits ...of the ordinary" ("The Prophets Conference", August 10th, 2007). Full video here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=... ... See MoreSee Less

 

Comment on Facebook

4 months ago

Christopher Fontenot

Yauhen Bahashou is well studied in the field of solar physics. His assertion that the electromagnetic perturbation being experienced here on Earth is "peculiar" may be an understatement. Knowing him personally, I can say, he's not a man prone to exaggeration.
While these observations are indeed, "peculiar", they are easily explained. Proton flux and magnetometer readings are affected by ionospheric heaters. The mechanism of this perturbation occurs through the high frequency modulation of Alfven waves in Earth's electrojets. Furthermore, these Alfven waves are the mechanism of 'communication between Earth and the Sun, along longitudinal conduits called Birkeland currents.
Inducing Alfven waves in our ionosphere creates the same mechanism of atmospheric charging, ionic heating, and resonance frequencies which occur naturally. This mechanism is well studied in plasma physics.

"Man could tap the Breast of Mother Sun and release her energy toward Earth as needed--magnetic as well as light."~ Nikola Tesla.
... See MoreSee Less

4 months ago

Roberto Murzzi
Video image

The great challenge is explain consciousness—the inner experiences of sense, thought, intent, feelings. It's what David Chalmers calls 'The Hard Problem' of ... ... See MoreSee Less

 

Comment on Facebook

"Great minds listen to understand, small minds listen to answer!"

Mind is a powerful thing! The great substance ever connected to the consciousness, in fact all those patterns that you physically moves in space/time is a result of everything that you experienced, lived, is like a constant traveling in one single point and never stops, the way as you move is the way that you keep connecting with other beautiful minds!

A good interview, and Sheldrake answering with much prudence and expanded consciousness, even if sometimes he doesn't enter into the core of the question of "Consciousnes without material bodies"...

+ View previous comments

5 months ago

Christopher Fontenot
Ive been researching the history of geo-engineering and I think I have found the genesis of it. Its seeds began with Fritz Zwicky. Zwicky called his colleagues “scatterbrains,” “sycophants and plain thieves” who “have no love for any of the lone wolves who are not fawners and apple polishers,” who “doctor their observational data to hide their shortcomings and to make the majority of the astronomers accept and believe in some of their most prejudicial and erroneous presentations and interpretations of facts,” and who therefore publish “useless trash in the bulging astronomical journals.” I have to say he sounds like my kind of guy, but I think he may have motivated some of the scatterbrain skeptics of his work to disprove him to show the world he was a crazy nuisance. He used scientific meetings and speeches as occasion to discuss a concept called morphology, which was first adopted for scientific inquiry by Goethe. Zwicky believed himself to be a problem solver using the morphological method first defines “all of the parameters that might be of importance” and then matches each parameter with every other parameter to produce a matrix containing “all of the potential solutions.” When I read about his ideas I came away with the idea he was trying to use thermodynamics, as an enegineer would use it, to undertand how the variables lead to a result. He was more of engineer in his thinking than he was a physicists or astonomer. This is when he proposed something that I believe his critics used to discredit him, but instead mankind got geo-engineering as an idea to test his theories to disprove him. With his theory of morphology as his tail wind he claimed to have finally found the philosopher’s stone to understand nature. This theory of morphology is what would allow Zwicky to aim for the heavens to test his ideas. I believe this is when his enemies decided to use his testing ideas against him. He famously remarked, “So far we have been just passive observers for thousands of years,” contrasting that traditional approach with a new one he called “experimental astronomy,” the direct investigation of celestial bodies. “Shoot the moon,” he counseled, and watch the effects through a telescope on Earth. Shoot the atmosphere of Venus—and Mars, too. And not just shoot. Rearrange. Use nuclear energy to flatten mountains on the moon and to alter the orbits of planets. Nudge Mars closer to the sun and see if it becomes habitable. Nudge the sun itself. Send it and all its gravitationally bound bodies, including Earth, toward a star with habitable planets so we might one day colonize other solar systems. As soon as he said it, we had his enemies begin to publish ideas about how we could use matter and light to shoot the Earth. Their original goal, I believe, was discredit Zwicky, who they hated. Even today, he remains unacknowledged by 20th and 21st century science historians because of his reputation as being difficult..........but his idea morphed into Geo-engineering when the industrial military complex realized that shooting parts of the Earth with the spectrum of light could be used to control many things mankind relies on. Zwicky also gave us the concept of supernovas and dark matter and neutron stars........Two of his predictions we know are true today, while the other one is driving physicists nuts to find evidence for. This goes on while governments go broke funding high energy physics and crazy astronomers ideas all tied back to Zwickys conjectures..............It amazes me how things evolve in science when they get infected by revenge and politics.~ Dr.Jack Kruse

"I've been researching the history of geo-engineering and I think I have found the genesis of it. Its seeds began with Fritz Zwicky. Zwicky called his colleagues “scatterbrains,” “sycophants and plain thieves” who “have no love for any of the lone wolves who are not fawners and apple polishers,” who “doctor their observational data to hide their shortcomings and to make the majority of the astronomers accept and believe in some of their most prejudicial and erroneous presentations and interpretations of facts,” and who therefore publish “useless trash in the bulging astronomical journals.” I have to say he sounds like my kind of guy, but I think he may have motivated some of the scatterbrain skeptics of his work to disprove him to show the world he was a crazy nuisance. He used scientific meetings and speeches as occasion to discuss a concept called morphology, which was first adopted for scientific inquiry by Goethe. Zwicky believed himself to be a problem solver using the morphological method first defines “all of the parameters that might be of importance” and then matches each parameter with every other parameter to produce a matrix containing “all of the potential solutions.” When I read about his ideas I came away with the idea he was trying to use thermodynamics, as an enegineer would use it, to undertand how the variables lead to a result. He was more of engineer in his thinking than he was a physicists or astonomer. This is when he proposed something that I believe his critics used to discredit him, but instead mankind got geo-engineering as an idea to test his theories to disprove him. With his "theory of morphology" as his tail wind he claimed "to have finally found the philosopher’s stone" to understand nature. This theory of morphology is what would allow Zwicky to aim for the heavens to test his ideas. I believe this is when his enemies decided to use his testing ideas against him. He famously remarked, “So far we have been just passive observers for thousands of years,” contrasting that traditional approach with a new one he called “experimental astronomy,” the direct investigation of celestial bodies. “Shoot the moon,” he counseled, and watch the effects through a telescope on Earth. Shoot the atmosphere of Venus—and Mars, too. And not just shoot. Rearrange. Use nuclear energy to flatten mountains on the moon and to alter the orbits of planets. Nudge Mars closer to the sun and see if it becomes habitable. Nudge the sun itself. Send it and all its gravitationally bound bodies, including Earth, toward a star with habitable planets so we might one day colonize other solar systems." As soon as he said it, we had his enemies begin to publish ideas about how we could use matter and light to "shoot the Earth". Their original goal, I believe, was discredit Zwicky, who they hated. Even today, he remains unacknowledged by 20th and 21st century science historians because of his reputation as being difficult..........but his idea morphed into Geo-engineering when the industrial military complex realized that shooting parts of the Earth with the spectrum of light could be used to control many things mankind relies on. Zwicky also gave us the concept of supernovas and dark matter and neutron stars........Two of his predictions we know are true today, while the other one is driving physicists nuts to find evidence for. This goes on while governments go broke funding high energy physics and crazy astronomers ideas all tied back to Zwicky's conjectures..............It amazes me how things evolve in science when they get infected by revenge and politics."~ Dr.Jack KruseJust how long has mankind and governments been using light to alter our environment? How much do you know about geo-engineering. It is a bigger issue than man's role in raising greenhouse gases because it likely plays the dominant role in why global warming is occuring. ... See MoreSee Less

6 months ago

Thomas Ehmer

What do you guys think about a potential correlation of the recent sun activity - as eventually a "warning shot" from our "sun god" for us as Earthlings regarding in the light of recent North Korea escalation? OK, it's far fetched, but you never really know ....
www.space.com/38057-sun-unleashes-decades-strongest-solar-flare.html
... See MoreSee Less

 

Comment on Facebook

Very interesting time....massive solar flare,...perseid meteor shower, followed by a meteorite hit in British Columbia,....all while B.C. and California are on fire.....a solar eclipse over the U.S......back to back record breaking Hurricanes, heat waves and floods,....social and political chaos. Selective perception ?.....maybe...maybe not.

+ View previous comments

6 months ago

Roberto Murzzi
Video image

Rupert answers this frequently asked question. ... See MoreSee Less

 

Comment on Facebook

of course... if you have the sense and awareness to notice !!!! however I call it normal !!!!... only those who do not want to see hear, smell and THINK call it paranormal 🙂

Sure, everywhere, just recently on a walk I had this very strong experience of something just being next to my right side, I stopped and looked, there was like a circle on the ground and like a column of energy... like something wanted to contact me... awesome experience! Have similar experiences with trees and certain shrubs, landscapes too, but his one was very unusual powerful!

Well, you are probably a medium and you to work out in those skills, your 6 sense is developed and detect those energies!

+ View previous comments

6 months ago

Roberto Murzzi
Video image

youtu.be/zamrs3nE9ysRupert Sheldrake's TEDx talk censored by the scientific board of TED. Sheldrake gives a brief summary of some of the points he writes about in his book 'The ... ... See MoreSee Less

 

Comment on Facebook

yey and Earth is flat !!! right TED ? .... OMG... !!!!

The earth most definitely is Flat this song encapsulates the deception, Enjoy: www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0FigeDls8I

+ View previous comments

Load more

Understanding Sacred Geometry and the Flower of Life SidebarAdvert
Delegate Program
The Delegate Program is Nassim Haramein's course in Unified Physics. Six modules cover in depth information that is sure to change your World View! We highly recommend it to anyone wanting to go deeper into understanding where we are and how we got here from a new perspective. www.Resonance.isResonanceAcademy250
SocialPlease
SocialLSocialTSocialGSocialF
Recent Comments
OUR FACEBOOK POSTS
[reforce_button]